Archives
Contribute
|
Congress Working To Limit Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
|
|
Jonathan B. Dubitzky, Pamela B. Fleming and Ameek Ponda 08/09/2004
The United States Senate on May 11, 2004 passed the Jumpstart
Our Business Strength (JOBS) Act (S. 1637), which includes
several provisions relating to nonqualified deferred compensation
plans. Another bill, the National Employee Savings and Trust
Equity Guarantee (NESTEG) Act (S. 2424), with virtually identical
provisions relating to nonqualified deferred compensation is
pending in the Senate. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(H.R. 4520), the House’s version of the JOBS Act, was introduced
in the House on June 4, 2004. Both the Senate and House
versions have many of the same provisions and both bills
significantly restrict the design of nonqualified deferred
compensation plans. While it is not certain when, or if, any of
these bills will be enacted into law, similar legislation relating to
nonqualified deferred compensation is thought likely to be enacted
this year or next. The JOBS Act would apply to any deferral of compensation in tax
years beginning after December 31, 2004, even if under a plan of
long standing. If this legislation is passed, all compensation
earned and deferred after December 31, 2004 would be included
in income for the first taxable year that the nonqualified deferred
compensation plan fails to meet the requirements specified in the
JOBS Act. Further, deferred compensation included in income
under this provision would be subject to an additional 10% tax
and interest computed at the underpayment rate on the tax that
would have been owed had the compensation not been deferred.
The House bill does not impose a 10% penalty on deferred
compensation that is included in income when the plan does not
meet specific requirements. However, previously deferred
compensation included in income is subject to interest at the
federal underpayment rate plus one percent, which could add up
to a significant penalty if compensation has been deferred for a
long time. The House bill would apply to deferrals made after
June 3, 2004. Following is a summary of the other major provisions of both the
Senate and House version of the JOBS Act relating to nonqualified
deferred compensation.
• If a plan permits employee elective deferrals, any employee
election must be made in the year preceding the year that the
compensation is earned. However, in the first year of plan
participation, an election may be made in the year the
compensation is earned as long as the election is made for
services to be performed subsequent to the election and the
election is made within 30 days from the date the employee becomes eligible to participate in
the plan.
• A deferred compensation plan may permit distributions on account of: (i) separation from
service (a “key employee” must wait 6 months after separation from service); (ii) disability;
(iii) death; (iv) a date or schedule specified under the plan; (v) a change in ownership or
control of the corporation; or (vi) an unforeseen emergency.
• A deferred compensation plan may permit acceleration of distributions on account of: (i) a
change in ownership or control of the corporation (the Senate version requires insiders to wait
for one year after the change in ownership); (ii) disability; or (iii) an unforeseen emergency
(essentially a severe financial hardship caused by events beyond the control of participant) if
the distribution is limited to the amount needed to satisfy the emergency plus a gross up for
taxes. Otherwise a plan may not permit an accelerated distribution.
• A deferred compensation plan may permit an employee to change the scheduled distribution
date once. Generally, any change in the payment date must be made at least 12 months prior
to the original payment date and the new distribution date must be at least 5 years later than
the original payment date.
• An employer’s deferred compensation plan may not permit participant investment options that
are broader than those offered under its tax-qualified defined contribution plan (e.g., its
401(k) plan) (if the employer has more than one plan, the comparison is to the one with the
fewest options). This provision is not in the House bill.
• A deferred compensation plan may not be funded through an offshore trust.
• A deferred compensation plan may not provide that a deterioration in the financial status of
the employer will trigger payment of the deferred compensation.
The JOBS Act also provides that if an employee exchanges an option to purchase employer securities,
employer securities themselves or “property based on employer securities” for a right to receive future
payments, the employee will have income in the year of exchange. For example, an executive who
surrenders in-the-money options for the right to receive deferred compensation equal to the value of
the options (a common technique in recent years) will recognize income at the time the options are
surrendered. This provision applies to exchanges made after December 31, 2004 and is not in the
House bill. Contact: Jonathan B. Dubitzky at
617.338.2936, Pamela B. Fleming
617.338.2427 and Ameek Ponda at
617.338.2443. (© 2004 Sullivan & Worcester LLP
Because sound legal advice must necessarily take into account all relevant facts and developments
in the law, the information you will find in this Advisory is not intended to constitute legal advice or a legal
opinion as to any particular matter. )
|
You may also access this article through our web-site http://www.lokvani.com/
|
|